What is the consequence of falsifying pasteurization records?

What is the consequence of falsifying pasteurization records?

• A. A misdemeanor offense
• B. A felony offense, punishable by fines up to $5,000
• C. A felony offense, punishable by fines up to $10,000 or imprisonment
• D. A civil penalty with no jail time

Answer: (C)

Falsifying pasteurization records is considered a serious offense due to the potential health risks associated with unpasteurized or improperly pasteurized products. The correct answer involves classifying this act as a felony offense, which carries significant penalties. Such severe classification underscores the legal system's intent to enforce strict adherence to food safety regulations. This means that individuals found guilty of this crime can face not only large fines, which can go up to $10,000, but also the possibility of imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent against actions that compromise public health, reinforcing the importance of accuracy and integrity in food processing records. The reason a civil penalty option is not the correct answer is that civil penalties typically do not include jail time and are less severe than criminal charges, which are deemed inappropriate given the gravity of falsifying records in the context of food safety. Similarly, the distinctions in fines and the type of offense show the legal system's perspective on how vital it is to maintain truthful documentation in food production and processing.

Falsifying pasteurization records is considered a serious offense due to the potential health risks associated with unpasteurized or improperly pasteurized products. The correct answer involves classifying this act as a felony offense, which carries significant penalties. Such severe classification underscores the legal system's intent to enforce strict adherence to food safety regulations.

This means that individuals found guilty of this crime can face not only large fines, which can go up to $10,000, but also the possibility of imprisonment. This serves as a deterrent against actions that compromise public health, reinforcing the importance of accuracy and integrity in food processing records.

The reason a civil penalty option is not the correct answer is that civil penalties typically do not include jail time and are less severe than criminal charges, which are deemed inappropriate given the gravity of falsifying records in the context of food safety. Similarly, the distinctions in fines and the type of offense show the legal system's perspective on how vital it is to maintain truthful documentation in food production and processing.